Tour sans Sagan: a comedy of errors?

So, believe it or not, the Tour is still happening. 😀 And UCI has extended their palmares of errors.

At least they corrected the most recent misstep — AFTER the video footage showed clear evidence of their mistake. (Was it really a mistake? Don’t answer that.)

Here’s what happened: UCI penalized 3 riders after stage 12 for picking up water bottles within 10k of the finish line, apparently a no-no. Problem for UCI came when video footage showed the stage 12 winner, French AG2R rider, Romain Bardet, also took a water bottle within 10k. That means, UCI had to either penalize the stage winner (and a  Frenchman, remember), or reverse the penalties on the other rides.

UCI chose to reverse the penalties and they issued a statement explaining that there was lack of water available to the riders before the last climb so due to these conditions, they were reversing the penalties to those 3 riders and the original finish results for stage 12 were reinstated. (I agree with this decision, possibly only because I’m also a fan of all of the riders involved.)

But how fun that this came up! Because there’s something that’s crossed my mind many times since stage 4 on July 4th.

If I close my eyes and allow my mind to really stretch and consider that just supposing the TdF jury rethinks their decision on the stage 4 incident (I said it’s a stretch!), what would be a fair and feasible way to make amends?

Well, as luck would have it, we can look at the 2015 Vuelta a Espana for some ideas.

At the 2015 Vuelta, Peter Sagan suffered cuts and burns to his leg when he was hit by a neutral race motorbike. After his heated reaction, he was fined by UCI for abusive language and for “behavior that damages the sport of cycling.” (Seems like a pretty natural response to get upset when you get hit by a vehicle, let alone in an officiated race where you don’t expect to be hit by a vehicle and where you were a favorite to win the race. It just seems like something that might have been forgiven. Again, it’s a stretch.)

In response to the penalty, though, Sagan’s Tinkoff-Saxo team sent an open letter to race organizers and UCI that included 5 requests, summarized as follows:

  1. A public apology for the motobike incident.
  2. A donation to the charity of team’s choice.
  3. Take concrete measures to improve safety for the riders.
  4. Revoke the fine to Sagan.
  5. A review of the rules for motobike drivers.

I think a public apology (for making the DQ decision without allowing the rider to defend his position as rules state) and a donation to the charity of the team’s choice would represent a good start for the 2017 Stage 4 DQ incident. I might also add:

  1. Initiate a review of the rules around disqualifications, possibly requiring a period of time to wait for evidence to be adequately reviewed.
  2. Fine Dimension Data team managers for acting unsportsmanlike in their accusations on social media (because seems damaging to the sport of cycling to NOT call that out).

And one more thing: Penalize Bouhanni a chunk of his Green Jersey points (I say 50) for his stage 10 behavior.

I know we’re in fantasy land right now, but what do you think?



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s